Mississippi School Report Card for 2002-2003
(No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)

6200 Scott County
006 Lake Middle

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires school report cards containing certain
information. The required information falls into three general areas: school improvement, teacher
qualifications and test data. A school that fails to make adequate yearly progress in achievement must
be identified for school improvement. The report must contain information about the professional
qualifications of teachers in core academic subject areas (English, reading, language arts, science,
mathematics, foreign languages, civics and government, arts, history, and geography). Highly qualified
teachers are those who held full state certification during the 2002-2003 school year. The report must
also contain achievement data for specific subgroups, two-year trends, and student participation rates.

2003 Accountability Results:

School Performance Classification = Level 4 Exemplary
(Achievement Level = 4 )

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Model Results as Mandated by NCLB 2001
The AYP determinations for the school are listed first, followed by those for the NCLB subgroups.
Note: Other academic indicator -- a 2002 graduation rate of 72%, an average attendance rate of
at least 93.8%, or meeting a growth expectation -- applies only at the overall school level.

Minumum subgroup size = 40           Reading/Language  Mathematics  Other Academic Indicator
-----------------------------------  ----------------  -----------  -------------------------
School Level Determinations                 NO              NO              YES
All Student Subgroup                       YES              NO
Economically Disadvantaged Students        YES             YES
Black Students                              NO              NO
White Students                             YES             YES

This school is not in school improvement.

Teacher quality information from the 2002/2003 school year:
Note: A new definition of highly qualified was approved by the SBOE in May 2003 and is effective in 2003
100.0% of the    25 NCLB core academic classes were taught by a highly qualified teacher.
100.0% of NCLB core academic subject teachers (based on    12 FTEs) were highly qualified.

School Level Test Data (Overall and Disaggregated by Subgroup)
Appendix A contains district level data and Appendix B contains state level data.

Tests: MCT=Mississippi Curriculum Test, WRIT=Writing Assessment, SATP=Subject Area Testing Program,
NRT=Norm Referenced Assessment (Terra Nova), ALT=Alternate Assessment.
For SATP English II Writing Assessment: NAR=Narrative Writing Prompt & INF=Informative Writing Prompt.
Subgroups: ALL=All Students, NDO=Non-Disabled Only, DO=Students with Disabilities Only, MAL=Male,
FEM=Female, BLK=Black, WHT=White, ASI=Asian, HIS=Hispanic, NAM=Native American, ELL=English Language
Learners, ED=Economically Disadvantaged, NED=Non-Economically Disadvantaged, MIG=Migrant Student.
MCT proficiency levels: Minimal, Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. Writing Assessments are scored 0-4.
Score Values: MCT=% Basic & Above / % Proficient & Above, WRIT=% Score 2 or Above / % Score 3 or Above,
SATP=Mean Scale Score or Mean Writing Score (0-4 points) & % Passing First Attempt, NRT=Mean NCE Score,
ALT= % Approaching Proficiency or Above / % Proficient. L12-L18 denote MCT instructional level testing.
## means 0%-4%, ** means 96%-100%, < means fewer than 10 students tested, - means no students tested.

               2001 <- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -   2002-2003   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
TEST SUBJ GRD -2002  ALL   NDO    DO   MAL   FEM   BLK   WHT   ASI   HIS   NAM   ELL   ED    NED   MIG
---- ---- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
MCT  READ GR4 **/95 **/** **/**   <   **/** **/** **/** **/**   -     -     -     -   **/** **/**   -
MCT  LANG GR4 **/87 **/76 **/78   <   **/74 **/79 **/68 **/85   -     -     -     -   **/71 **/83   -
MCT  MATH GR4 94/84 **/93 **/95   <   **/91 **/94 **/86 **/**   -     -     -     -   **/87 **/**   -
MCT  READ GR5 90/79 **/88 **/87   <   **/85 **/90 **/80 **/94   -     -     -     -   **/81 **/**   -
MCT  LANG GR5 92/67 **/88 **/87   <   **/81 **/92 **/87 **/88   -     -     -     -   **/83 **/93   -
MCT  MATH GR5 87/65 95/74 95/73   <   92/81 **/68 **/63 94/82   -     -     -     -   95/64 **/86   -
MCT  READ GR6 85/69 91/87 91/86   <   94/94 89/80 83/74 **/**   -     <     -     -   85/78 **/**   -
MCT  LANG GR6 94/48 **/82 **/82   <   **/88 **/77 **/71 **/94   -     <     -     -   **/78 **/89   -
MCT  MATH GR6 83/65 88/65 88/64   <   **/70 77/60 86/49 91/81   -     <     -     -   85/60 93/72   -
MCT  READ GR7 83/56 81/62 80/60   <   86/76 74/43 67/33 90/81   -     -     -     -   73/49 95/84   -
MCT  LANG GR7 87/33 94/49 94/50   <   89/46 **/52 **/30 90/62   -     -     -     -   94/39 94/67   -
MCT  MATH GR7 63/37 73/48 72/47   <   81/59 62/33 60/20 82/68   -     -     -     -   67/37 83/67   -
MCT  READ GR8 62/35 89/49 89/49   -   89/50 89/48 86/23 90/68   -     -     -     -   83/50 **/48   -
MCT  LANG GR8 87/35 94/51 94/51   -   92/50 **/52 **/27 94/68   -     -     -     -   90/40 **/65   -
MCT  MATH GR8 56/29 74/45 74/45   -   81/46 67/44 73/41 74/48   -     -     -     -   80/47 65/43   -
WRIT      GR4 **/76 **/14 **/15   <   **/13 **/16 **/14 **/15   -     -     -     -   **/13 **/17   -
WRIT      GR7 95/13 **/08 **/08   <   **/## **/13 **/05 **/10   -     -     -     -   **/## **/17   -
NRT  READ GR6        55.2  55.4   <    57.3  53.2  47.4  64.3   -     <     -     -    49.9  64.1   -
NRT  LANG GR6        58.6  58.7   <    60.1  57.3  53.3  64.8   -     <     -     -    54.2  66.0   -
NRT  MATH GR6        51.6  51.6   <    54.8  48.8  46.6  57.8   -     <     -     -    48.5  57.0   -
MCT  READ L12 64/36   <     -     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  LANG L12 73/##   <     -     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  MATH L12   <     <     <     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  READ L13   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     <     -
MCT  LANG L13   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     <     -
MCT  MATH L13   <     <     <     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     <     -
MCT  READ L14   <     <     <     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  LANG L14   <     <     <     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  MATH L14   <     <     <     <     <     <     <     <     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  READ L15   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     -     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  LANG L15   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     -     -     -     -     -     <     -     -
MCT  MATH L15   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     -     -     -     -     -     <     <     -
MCT  LANG L16   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     -     -     -     -     -     -     <     -
ALT  COMP ALL   <     <     -     <     <     -     <     -     -     -     -     -     <     -     -

% TESTED R/LA         95    99    <     93    98    93    98    -     <     -     -     96    94    -
% TESTED MATH         94    98    <     91    97    92    96    -     <     -     -     95    93    -

The 2002/2003 test participation rates above are calculated separately for reading/language arts (R/LA)
and mathematics (MATH).  They are based on students enrolled in grades 3-8, students with disabilities
coded as ungraded who were the same age as students in those grades, and students enrolled in English II
or Algebra I during the school year.  All students who took an MCT at grade level or at instructional
level, an alternate assessment, an English II test, or an Algebra I test were counted as tested.
A participation rate is shown if the number of students in the subgroup is 40 or greater.

All the information presented in this report (including the Appendix) is based on data extracted from
the Mississippi Student Information System (MSIS) and from the 2002-2003 statewide assessment files.
The information is correct to the extent that the data were accurate in those data sources.